BARRISTER MAGAZINE

Reconsidering how we talk about legal professional privilege

The Law Society announced last November its intention to intervene in Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation (SFO v ENRC) as it seeks to protect the right of clients to communicate confidentially with their lawyers.
The gradual erosion of a right
Earlier in (2017) alarm bells rang throughout the legal sector at the latest assault on one of the foundations of our justice system – legal professional privilege (LPP).
That was because on 8 May 2017 the High Court ruled the Serious Fraud Office could access materials gathered by lawyers during internal investigations into allegations of corruption, taking a narrow view of the scope of legal advice and litigation privilege.
The perverse effect of this ruling is that companies could be discouraged from self-investigating pr...

Become a subscriber to read this article. Sign up today for just $5.99 per month. Click on SUBSCRIBE to sign up. You can cancel anytime if you are not satisfied.

Exit mobile version